Pauses matter: Rule-learning in children
- Anika van der Klis Anika van der Klis ORCID profile. (opens in new tab) , Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University (opens in new tab)
- Rianne van Lieburg, Rianne.vanLieburg@uantwerpen.be(compose email, opens in email app.), University of Antwerp (opens in new tab)
- Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Leiden University (opens in new tab)
- Clara Cecilia Levelt, Leiden University (opens in new tab)
Abstract
Language learners have to both segment words and discover grammatical rules connecting those words in sentences. In adult listeners, the presence of a prosodic cue in the speech stream, for example, a pause, appears to facilitate rule-learning of non-adjacent dependencies of the form AiXCi (Peña et al., 2002). Only when listening to the artificial language containing pauses, could participants identify rule-words of the form AiAjCi or AiCjCi, where intervening syllables were moved from A- or C-positions. Frost and Monaghan (2016) found in a similar study that participants who were tested with novel, rather than moved, intervening syllables in AiXCi items showed rule-learning even when the familiarisation stream contained no pauses. The present study re-examines the facilitative effect of pauses in discovering structural rules in speech in a novel population: children aged 7-11. We used the same artificial speech stimuli as Peña et al. (2002) and tested children in both a moved-syllable and novel-syllable forced-choice task. The results of 140 children show that pauses provide a facilitative effect on rule-learning – also for young learners. Regardless of syllable types, only children who listened to the familiarisation stream containing pauses chose words following the rule above chance-level.
Keywords:
- school-aged children
- prosody
- non-adjacent dependencies
- statistical learning
- language acquisition
- artificial grammar learning
Published on
3 March 2023
Peer Reviewed